![]() It also has three sound dispersion patterns. A four inch woofer and 1 inch tweeter in front and two 2.5 inch midrange on the side. The shape also allows for great surround imaging. The half moon feature looks really great mounted on the wall. Out of the box, these speakers are really great looking. I bought these speakers to upgrade from the CSW surround IV speakers. See my reviews of the MC300 and P500 subwoofer. It was really quite entertaining for movies and sweet sounding for two channel all things considered.I recently purchased these speakers as part of the MC300.5 package. A decent receiver ($800 new-I didn't know about used audio then), $1500 Vienna Acoustic Bachs, $250 Cambridge Soundworks Center (Used, sub $100 now), $200 Boston Acoustic dipole surrounds. In addition, if (who are we kidding.when) you decided to upgrade, replacing the surrounds or the center won't be a hard hit and you will have a solid base (your front speakers) to build off of.įor what it's worth, this is the route I took at the beginning. With your budget and criteria, this will provide you with the best 2 channel possible and I really don't think your movie experience will suffer at all. Spend the rest on the front pair of speakers. Cambridge Soundworks has very inexpensive center speakers which really aren't all that bad for dialogue-used, easily under $100. If you happen to be the only person ever to step foot in these forums with self-control when it comes to budgeting for audio and $2500-3000 is your absolute limit, I'd do this: Set a $200 max on surround speakers, pick up a beefy receiver used and try to limit it to under $1000 (which will get you quite a bit in a used receiver). While I agree that 5.1 for movies is vastly superior to 2 channel, I would advise doing it in a stepwise fashion, or, at the very least, don't let the two channel audio get pushed to the backburner by getting some boxed ready-to-go 5.1 setup. However, I know that most of my friends share them as well. If you are going to listen to music, do it right and dedicate a stereo for that alone. If you are going to listen to movies, do it right and get a 5.1 surround sound HT setup. My two cents on this matter mostly boils down to this: (However, I consider them to be more for HT use, rather than for stereo use. If you really want monitor type speakers, the M&K speakers are relatively inexpensive and yet are accurate and can play loud. Don't forget that you'll need an integrated amp, not just a power amp (or else you will need a preamp too.) I also recommend you stick with SS, as it is less tweaky than tubes, and since you want to use it mostly for movies, you will probably want decent power and really good bass. I can use it to listen to music, but only casually, not seriously.) However, it is not really all that great for audio, or at least it is not in the realm of what I consider to be high end. (I have a decent HT receiver, a Denon 3802. (I also think that listening to movies in two channels is not nearly as good as listening in 5.1 - again, I am going against most people on this site, as least according to one of the threads started recently.) My recommendation, and I know I buck most peoples opinion on this site, is that you should not try to combine audio and video, at least not in the price range you are in. It can also serve, (temporarily, until you can afford to get a good stereo system), as an amp for listening to music. This will allow you the maximum flexibility, and it will have the DTS, Dolby Digital and THX decoding that you will need should you ever decide to upgrade to a full blown 5.1 (or better) surround sound system. There are lots of them out there that can work for both home theater as well as audio. If you are going to be using it for movies mostly, (and audio as a secondary use), I recommend getting a good HT receiver.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |